NTSX vs. SSO
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. NTSX is actively managed, while SSO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.23%/yr vs 18.57%/yr for SSO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
NTSX vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 15.08% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 47.12%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
NTSX vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.28% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -7.87% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 15.08% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -21.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and SSO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NTSX and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSX vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
SSO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
SSO
Communication Services
NTSX
SSO
Financial Services
NTSX
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
SSO
Healthcare
NTSX
SSO
Industrials
NTSX
SSO
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
SSO
Energy
NTSX
SSO
Utilities
NTSX
SSO
Real Estate
NTSX
SSO
Basic Materials
NTSX
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
SSO
NTSX vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.42 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 10.37 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -84.67% | +53.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -18.17% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -35.21% | +18.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -46.73% | +15.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -4.94% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -19.55% | +12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 4.24% | -2.11% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 5.05%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 8.74% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 19.17% | -8.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 24.54% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 33.78% | -16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 35.95% | -17.65% |
NTSX vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSX vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than SSO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NTSX and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSO has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to NTSX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 18.57% vs 9.23% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.64% for SSO.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer