PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return.


NTSX

1D
1.59%
1M
1.07%
6M
7.46%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.84%

DBO

1D
-5.53%
1M
17.71%
6M
53.16%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.34M$10.71M$13.49M
$1.98M$1.82M$2.61M

NTSX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.99%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
66.72%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and DBO is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.12

The correlation between NTSX and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTSX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSXDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.86

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

5.64

+2.97

NTSX vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-90.18%

+58.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-27.73%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-28.20%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-37.68%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-56.13%

+55.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-62.20%

+55.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

9.16%

-6.90%

Volatility

NTSX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 4.14%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

18.99%

-14.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

34.30%

-23.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

38.86%

-25.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

33.43%

-16.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

32.24%

-14.01%

NTSX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DBO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.11%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSX and DBO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to NTSX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 13.64% vs 8.42% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.78% for DBO.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer