PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. BIGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than BIGPX's 10.25% return.


NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

BIGPX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.25%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.70%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%
BIGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I
10.25%16.08%2.52%15.92%-15.80%7.38%21.62%21.03%-5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and BIGPX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.86

The correlation between NTSX and BIGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. BIGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BIGPX
BIGPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSXBIGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.20

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

14.46

-2.21

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the BIGPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and BIGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSXBIGPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.57

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.50

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum BIGPX drawdown of -46.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and BIGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXBIGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-46.95%

+15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-7.27%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-18.04%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-21.88%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-6.27%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.60%

+0.47%

Volatility

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXBIGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.27%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

7.69%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

9.07%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

11.93%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

11.37%

+6.90%

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGPX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSX vs. BIGPX - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BIGPX's 7.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I
7.23%7.97%0.00%3.02%2.59%7.60%3.76%3.77%9.80%3.20%1.76%9.89%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSX and BIGPX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to BIGPX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs BIGPX's -46.95%.

BIGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and BIGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer