PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


NTSX vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSX
ASET

Technology

35.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

12.5%
12.1%

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.2%

Industrials

7.7%
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
1.1%

Energy

3.5%
7.8%

Utilities

2.1%
12.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
41.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
5.8%

Technology

NTSX
35.1%
ASET
0.2%

Communication Services

NTSX
12.5%
ASET
12.1%

Financial Services

NTSX
12.3%
ASET

-

Consumer Cyclical

NTSX
10.1%
ASET
0.1%

Healthcare

NTSX
8.4%
ASET
2.2%

Industrials

NTSX
7.7%
ASET
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

NTSX
5.5%
ASET
1.1%

Energy

NTSX
3.5%
ASET
7.8%

Utilities

NTSX
2.1%
ASET
12.8%

Real Estate

NTSX
1.5%
ASET
41.6%

Basic Materials

NTSX
1.4%
ASET
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSXASETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

NTSX vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSXASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

0.00%

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

0.00%

-6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

NTSX vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

0.00%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

0.00%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

0.00%

+18.27%

NTSX vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSX vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer