PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NTSG.DE is traded in EUR, while IWMO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWMO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSG.DE achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than IWMO.L's 23.28% return.


NTSG.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
5.20%
YTD
8.92%
6M
7.87%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWMO.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
8.64%
YTD
23.28%
6M
23.71%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NTSG.DE and IWMO.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

0.71

The correlation between NTSG.DE and IWMO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSG.DE
NTSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMO.L
IWMO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSG.DEIWMO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.33

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

13.02

-1.37

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IWMO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSG.DE and IWMO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSG.DEIWMO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Drawdowns

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum IWMO.L drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSG.DE and IWMO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSG.DEIWMO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-31.00%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-9.46%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.91%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.69%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.42%

-0.65%

Volatility

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) is 3.24%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWMO.L) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that NTSG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSG.DEIWMO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

6.14%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

15.12%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

17.78%

-6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

17.95%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

17.99%

-3.69%

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NTSG.DE and IWMO.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSG.DE vs. IWMO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTSG.DE nor IWMO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSG.DE and IWMO.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSG.DE and IWMO.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

NTSG.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while IWMO.L is Momentum. NTSG.DE tracks WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index, while IWMO.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSG.DE and IWMO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer