NTSE vs. PBL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL).

NTSE and PBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NTSE is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on May 20, 2021. PBL is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 12, 2022.

Performance

NTSE vs. PBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NTSE vs. PBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund	5.59%	36.29%	4.42%	9.47%	-3.18%
PBL PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF	-2.98%	12.35%	16.70%	14.28%	-3.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than PBL's -2.98% return.

NTSE

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: -10.28%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 11.12%
• 1Y: 37.04%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBL

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: -2.98%
• 6M: -1.20%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. PBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PBL's 0.45% expense ratio.

PBL

PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

NTSE

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund

Return for Risk

NTSE vs. PBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE

NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 88
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PBL

PBL Risk / Return Rank: 63
PBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PBL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. PBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTSE	PBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.04	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.55	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	1.86	+0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.31	7.64	+2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTSE vs. PBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the PBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and PBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSE	PBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	1.04	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.10	-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and PBL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NTSE vs. PBL - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than PBL's 2.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund	3.14%	3.35%	3.23%	2.44%	3.22%	2.10%
PBL PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF	2.28%	2.21%	6.89%	7.92%	0.16%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. PBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than PBL's maximum drawdown of -11.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and PBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSE	PBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.84%	-11.69%	-31.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.20%	-6.63%	-7.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.81%	-4.49%	-6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.35%	-1.69%	-18.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	1.61%	+1.99%

Volatility

NTSE vs. PBL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL) at 3.20%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSE	PBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	3.20%	+7.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.30%	6.85%	+8.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.34%	11.36%	+8.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	9.88%	+8.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	9.88%	+8.88%