PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's 11.25% return.


NTSE

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.69%
YTD
30.29%
6M
33.64%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

GDE

1D
1.33%
1M
2.08%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
47.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
30.29%36.29%4.42%9.47%-15.68%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
11.25%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and GDE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.60

The correlation between NTSE and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSEGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.35

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.42

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

7.50

+8.77

NTSE vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSEGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

1.93

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.17

-0.80

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-32.01%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-22.66%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-22.66%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-9.99%

+7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-7.89%

-11.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

7.29%

-3.63%

Volatility

NTSE vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 6.68%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

6.68%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

24.27%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

28.41%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

26.12%

-6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

26.12%

-6.88%

NTSE vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than GDE's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.88%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.54%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and GDE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to GDE (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 47.08% vs 24.55% for NTSE. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.08% return vs 24.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NTSE.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.54% for NTSE.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.20% for GDE.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer