NTSD vs. USFR
NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. NTSD is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
NTSD vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
NTSD vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSD and USFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSD vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
NTSD
USFR
NTSD vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.08 | 1.60 | +3.48 |
Drawdowns
NTSD vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -1.36% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | 0.00% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.16% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
NTSD vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 0.27% | +24.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 0.40% | +23.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 0.81% | +23.47% |
NTSD vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSD vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSD and USFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NTSD.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
NTSD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for NTSD and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer