NSMRX vs. FTHSX
NSMRX (Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and FTHSX (FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NSMRX returned 12.55%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for FTHSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSMRX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FTHSX.
Performance
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSMRX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than FTHSX's 14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NSMRX has underperformed FTHSX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while FTHSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
NSMRX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 30.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
FTHSX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSMRX Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 18.66% | 12.10% | 20.17% | 14.45% | -5.69% | 39.41% | 0.97% | 30.56% | -19.00% | 10.35% |
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 14.90% | 12.02% | 16.17% | 22.55% | -7.49% | 30.83% | 10.38% | 28.06% | -13.18% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSMRX and FTHSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NSMRX and FTHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSMRX vs. FTHSX — Risk / Return Rank
NSMRX
FTHSX
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (NSMRX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSMRX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.66 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | 9.48 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSMRX drawdown since its inception was -68.14%, which is greater than FTHSX's maximum drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSMRX and FTHSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSMRX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.14% | -37.74% | -30.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -9.42% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.02% | -24.58% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.02% | -24.58% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.57% | -37.74% | -6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -0.64% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -5.60% | -5.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.63% | +0.29% |
Volatility
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (NSMRX) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX) at 4.00%. This indicates that NSMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSMRX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 4.00% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 10.97% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 15.20% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 18.86% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 20.06% | +1.31% |
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSMRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHSX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSMRX vs. FTHSX - Dividend Comparison
NSMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than FTHSX's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 0.47% | 0.54% | 8.05% | 1.81% | 1.23% | 3.77% | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 15.40% |
NSMRX Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.80% | 6.89% | 11.02% | 0.69% | 5.19% | 19.32% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 43.81% | 5.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSMRX and FTHSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSMRX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to FTHSX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSMRX dropped -68.14% vs FTHSX's -37.74%.
NSMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSMRX and FTHSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer