PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSIVX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Square Altrinsic International Equity Fund (NSIVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSIVX achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 6.41% return.


NSIVX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.61%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.76%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*

GSIMX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
6.41%
6M
8.00%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NSIVX
North Square Altrinsic International Equity Fund
4.75%25.40%3.65%14.88%-8.10%6.38%1.71%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.41%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NSIVX and GSIMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020

0.77

The correlation between NSIVX and GSIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSIVX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSIVX
NSIVX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NSIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NSIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square Altrinsic International Equity Fund (NSIVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSIVXGSIMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.90

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.76

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.15

5.94

-1.79

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSIVX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSIVXGSIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.62

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.82

-0.20

Drawdowns

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSIVX drawdown since its inception was -25.86%, smaller than the maximum GSIMX drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSIVX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSIVXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.86%

-28.84%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-7.81%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-10.32%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-25.37%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-3.74%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-4.82%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.32%

+0.96%

Volatility

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

North Square Altrinsic International Equity Fund (NSIVX) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.81%. This indicates that NSIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSIVXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.81%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

7.91%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

9.68%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

14.36%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.59%

15.70%

-2.11%

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSIVX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSIVX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

NSIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.81%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%
NSIVX
North Square Altrinsic International Equity Fund
10.50%11.00%5.59%1.59%1.51%1.91%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSIVX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSIVX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to GSIMX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSIVX dropped -25.86% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSIVX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer