PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a DKK 10,000 investment in Novozymes A/S (NSIS-B.CO) and H Lundbeck A/S (HLUN-B.CO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSIS-B.CO achieves a -8.88% return, which is significantly lower than HLUN-B.CO's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NSIS-B.CO has outperformed HLUN-B.CO with an annualized return of 3.03%, while HLUN-B.CO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.39% annualized return.


NSIS-B.CO

1D
0.22%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
-8.88%
6M
-8.00%
1Y
-20.86%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
3.03%

HLUN-B.CO

1D
1.36%
1M
5.26%
YTD
7.04%
6M
3.17%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
-0.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSIS-B.CO
Novozymes A/S
-8.88%1.60%10.91%8.90%-33.63%55.73%8.80%13.95%-16.77%47.75%
HLUN-B.CO
H Lundbeck A/S
7.04%7.11%28.84%28.12%-22.04%-19.13%-17.92%-10.86%-9.40%9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NSIS-B.CO and HLUN-B.CO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2000

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Novozymes A/S

H Lundbeck A/S

Often compared with HLUN-B.CO:
HLUN-B.CO vs. NVO

Return for Risk

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSIS-B.CO
NSIS-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NSIS-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSIS-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSIS-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NSIS-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSIS-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HLUN-B.CO
HLUN-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HLUN-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLUN-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLUN-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HLUN-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLUN-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novozymes A/S (NSIS-B.CO) and H Lundbeck A/S (HLUN-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSIS-B.COHLUN-B.CODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.18

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

1.16

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

2.50

-3.69

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSIS-B.CO Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the HLUN-B.CO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSIS-B.CO and HLUN-B.CO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSIS-B.COHLUN-B.CODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

0.86

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.18

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

-0.01

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.18

+0.23

Drawdowns

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSIS-B.CO drawdown since its inception was -52.31%, smaller than the maximum HLUN-B.CO drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSIS-B.CO and HLUN-B.CO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSIS-B.COHLUN-B.CODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.31%

-74.26%

+21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.44%

-21.88%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

-42.85%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-42.85%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.90%

-74.26%

+27.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.78%

-47.65%

+21.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-47.15%

+33.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.62%

10.09%

+7.53%

Volatility

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Volatility Comparison

Novozymes A/S (NSIS-B.CO) and H Lundbeck A/S (HLUN-B.CO) have volatilities of 6.88% and 6.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSIS-B.COHLUN-B.CODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

6.72%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.10%

20.96%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.96%

29.50%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

29.78%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.61%

32.23%

-6.62%

Dividends

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Dividend Comparison

NSIS-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than HLUN-B.CO's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLUN-B.CO
H Lundbeck A/S
2.57%2.20%1.69%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NSIS-B.CO
Novozymes A/S
1.77%1.58%0.98%2.75%1.56%0.98%1.50%1.53%1.55%1.13%1.44%0.91%

Financials

NSIS-B.CO vs. HLUN-B.CO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novozymes A/S and H Lundbeck A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in DKK except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NSIS-B.CO and HLUN-B.CO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSIS-B.CO and HLUN-B.CO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer