PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NS4E.DE achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than VJPA.DE's 14.46% return.


NS4E.DE

1D
-2.16%
1M
-2.98%
6M
9.96%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
13.98%

VJPA.DE

1D
-2.45%
1M
-4.05%
6M
7.48%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
17.06%27.33%22.81%33.35%-4.26%10.90%7.50%7.75%
VJPA.DE
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
14.46%13.28%13.06%15.84%-11.43%9.42%4.85%-6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.84

The correlation between NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (5 years) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPA.DE
VJPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VJPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NS4E.DEVJPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.18

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

10.50

+4.51

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the VJPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NS4E.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than VJPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NS4E.DEVJPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-30.84%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-9.84%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-16.01%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-18.90%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-6.33%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.00%

-6.49%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.99%

-0.18%

Volatility

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE) have volatilities of 6.07% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NS4E.DEVJPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

6.30%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.68%

15.82%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

19.19%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.40%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

17.94%

+0.26%

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NS4E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NS4E.DE vs. VJPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NS4E.DE nor VJPA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VJPA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VJPA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while VJPA.DE tracks FTSE Japan. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NS4E.DE and 0.15% for VJPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NS4E.DE and VJPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer