NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE
NS4E.DE (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)) and FWIA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NS4E.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while FWIA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NS4E.DE returned 26.09%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for FWIA.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NS4E.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWIA.DE.
Performance
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NS4E.DE achieves a 20.94% return, which is significantly higher than FWIA.DE's 13.31% return.
NS4E.DE
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- YTD
- 20.94%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
FWIA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 13.31%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NS4E.DE Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) | 20.94% | 27.33% | 22.81% | 5.82% |
FWIA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | 13.31% | 9.02% | 24.70% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NS4E.DE and FWIA.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between NS4E.DE and FWIA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NS4E.DE
FWIA.DE
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NS4E.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 3.96 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.73 | 15.76 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NS4E.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than FWIA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NS4E.DE and FWIA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NS4E.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -20.96% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -6.49% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.96% | -20.96% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.72% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -2.40% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.63% | +1.14% |
Volatility
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) at 3.57%. This indicates that NS4E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWIA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NS4E.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 3.57% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 8.64% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 11.71% | +7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 13.18% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 13.18% | +5.07% |
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NS4E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FWIA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NS4E.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NS4E.DE nor FWIA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NS4E.DE and FWIA.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NS4E.DE.
NS4E.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while FWIA.DE is Global Equities. NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NS4E.DE and 0.15% for FWIA.DE.
Find the right allocation for NS4E.DE and FWIA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer