PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NS4E.DE achieves a 20.94% return, which is significantly higher than EQQX.DE's 19.18% return.


NS4E.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
2.16%
6M
19.66%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
15.07%

EQQX.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.00%
6M
20.51%
YTD
19.18%
1Y
33.29%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
16.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
20.94%27.33%22.81%33.35%-4.26%2.51%
EQQX.DE
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
19.18%7.13%33.88%51.62%-29.90%24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.54

The correlation between NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQX.DE
EQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NS4E.DEEQQX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

1.66

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

3.16

+13.57

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NS4E.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than EQQX.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NS4E.DEEQQX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-31.17%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-20.09%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-26.80%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-31.17%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-2.51%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-8.93%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

10.54%

-7.77%

Volatility

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) is 5.77%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that NS4E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NS4E.DEEQQX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

6.60%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

12.32%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

27.34%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

22.18%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

21.94%

-3.69%

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NS4E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQX.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NS4E.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NS4E.DE nor EQQX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NS4E.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NS4E.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQQX.DE.

NS4E.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while EQQX.DE is Nasdaq-100. NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while EQQX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NS4E.DE and 0.20% for EQQX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NS4E.DE and EQQX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer