NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO
NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SVR.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L returned 9.77%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for SVR.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR.TO.
Performance
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while SVR.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than SVR.TO's -20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L has outperformed SVR.TO with an annualized return of 9.77%, while SVR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.86% annualized return.
NRJL.L
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 38.38%
- 6M
- 37.58%
- 1Y
- 79.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
SVR.TO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- YTD
- -20.09%
- 6M
- -25.15%
- 1Y
- 56.72%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 38.38% | 35.47% | -11.56% | -22.87% | -8.74% | -5.40% | 33.09% | 47.31% | -7.75% | 15.17% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | -20.09% | 134.11% | 11.36% | -3.59% | 5.31% | -12.16% | 42.14% | 13.14% | -11.57% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRJL.L and SVR.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2009 | 0.11 |
The correlation between NRJL.L and SVR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NRJL.L
SVR.TO
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NRJL.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.92 | 1.10 | +6.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.54 | 2.50 | +26.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum SVR.TO drawdown of -79.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and SVR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRJL.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.56% | -79.28% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.93% | -51.98% | +42.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -51.98% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.10% | -51.98% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.56% | -51.98% | -2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -50.21% | +46.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -54.09% | +30.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 22.80% | -20.04% |
Volatility
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 9.59%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) has a volatility of 15.64%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRJL.L | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 15.64% | -6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 55.78% | -38.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 58.48% | -37.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 35.48% | -13.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 31.77% | -10.45% |
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRJL.L vs. SVR.TO - Dividend Comparison
NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while SVR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.30% | 0.42% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.70% | 1.02% | 0.59% | 0.79% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRJL.L and SVR.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NRJL.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NRJL.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
NRJL.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SVR.TO is Silver. NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SVR.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.66% for SVR.TO.
Find the right allocation for NRJL.L and SVR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer