NRJL.L vs. IUES.L
NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - NRJL.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while IUES.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NRJL.L returned 31.39%/yr vs 21.71%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than IUES.L's 31.41% return.
NRJL.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 6M
- 132.36%
- 1Y
- 205.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.93%
- 5Y*
- 31.39%
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 36.32% | 130.90% | -11.57% | -22.89% | 20.78% | 36.43% | 19.52% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.98% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 83.32% | 53.38% | 29.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRJL.L and IUES.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between NRJL.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRJL.L
IUES.L
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Utilities
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Technology
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
NRJL.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
NRJL.L
IUES.L
Real Estate
NRJL.L
-
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
NRJL.L
IUES.L
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRJL.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.46 | 1.36 | +1.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.97 | 2.89 | +21.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 85.38 | 8.95 | +76.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRJL.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.08 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRJL.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.06% | -62.40% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -16.59% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.91% | -23.92% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.06% | -23.92% | -27.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -8.77% | +6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -16.00% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 5.37% | -2.98% |
Volatility
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 7.66%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRJL.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 8.73% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.66% | 19.54% | +35.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.66% | 23.12% | +48.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.42% | 26.63% | +18.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.84% | 28.23% | +15.61% |
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRJL.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.86%, while IUES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 30.86% | 42.07% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 23.99% | 31.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRJL.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.
NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for NRJL.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer