NRJL.L vs. 100D.L
NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and 100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while 100D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NRJL.L returned 31.39%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for 100D.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for 100D.L.
Performance
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 6.04% return.
NRJL.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 6M
- 130.93%
- 1Y
- 206.01%
- 3Y*
- 29.93%
- 5Y*
- 31.39%
- 10Y*
- —
100D.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- —
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 36.32% | 130.90% | -11.57% | -22.89% | 20.78% | 36.43% | 19.52% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 6.04% | 25.77% | 9.32% | 7.37% | 4.80% | 18.00% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRJL.L and 100D.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between NRJL.L and 100D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRJL.L
100D.L
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Industrials
NRJL.L
100D.L
Utilities
NRJL.L
100D.L
Basic Materials
NRJL.L
100D.L
Technology
NRJL.L
100D.L
Consumer Cyclical
NRJL.L
100D.L
Financial Services
NRJL.L
100D.L
Communication Services
NRJL.L
100D.L
Healthcare
NRJL.L
100D.L
Consumer Defensive
NRJL.L
100D.L
Energy
NRJL.L
100D.L
Real Estate
NRJL.L
-
100D.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank
NRJL.L
100D.L
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRJL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.46 | 1.36 | +1.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.97 | 2.38 | +21.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 85.38 | 8.06 | +77.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRJL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 1.94 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.92 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.53 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, which is greater than 100D.L's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and 100D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRJL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.06% | -34.63% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.92% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.78% | -13.06% | -27.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.06% | -13.06% | -38.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -4.00% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -4.69% | -17.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.64% | -0.25% |
Volatility
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that NRJL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRJL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 3.98% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.66% | 9.52% | +45.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.66% | 10.96% | +60.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.42% | 12.88% | +32.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.84% | 15.92% | +27.92% |
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRJL.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison
NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.86%, more than 100D.L's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.57% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 30.86% | 42.07% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 23.99% | 31.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRJL.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.
NRJL.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.14% for 100D.L.
Find the right allocation for NRJL.L and 100D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer