NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO).
NRGY.TO and CASH.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NRGY.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2024. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021.
Performance
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NRGY.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF | 30.90% | 14.36% | -3.17% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.35% | 2.45% | 0.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGY.TO achieves a 30.90% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.35% return.
NRGY.TO
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 30.90%
- 6M
- 31.97%
- 1Y
- 41.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRGY.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NRGY.TO
CASH.TO
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 8.36 | -6.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 14.67 | -12.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 5.68 | -4.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 17.04 | -14.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 233.38 | -223.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 8.36 | -6.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 5.43 | -3.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGY.TO and CASH.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
NRGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than CASH.TO's 2.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGY.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF | 2.87% | 3.87% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGY.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -0.80% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -0.13% | -16.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.13% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | 0.00% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 0.01% | +4.34% |
Volatility
NRGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.15%. This indicates that NRGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NRGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 0.15% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 0.20% | +11.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.77% | 0.26% | +18.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 0.63% | +18.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 0.63% | +18.17% |