PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQVAX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Multi-Cap Value Fund Class A (NQVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, NQVAX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 12.66%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


NQVAX

1D
0.44%
1M
1.61%
YTD
13.25%
6M
14.26%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
12.66%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQVAX
Nuveen Multi-Cap Value Fund Class A
13.25%17.62%18.95%15.65%-1.27%28.22%-0.51%29.99%-14.58%18.37%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NQVAX and FALIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2002

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between NQVAX and FALIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQVAX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQVAX
NQVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NQVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NQVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi-Cap Value Fund Class A (NQVAX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQVAXFALIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

2.89

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.15

4.92

+12.23

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQVAX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQVAXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.81

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.78

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.77

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.48

-0.02

Drawdowns

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQVAX drawdown since its inception was -67.90%, which is greater than FALIX's maximum drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQVAX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQVAXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.90%

-62.37%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-5.03%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-18.89%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-21.48%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.29%

-37.51%

-4.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-4.17%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-13.28%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.78%

-0.85%

Volatility

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Multi-Cap Value Fund Class A (NQVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NQVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQVAXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

0.00%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

4.20%

+5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

8.06%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.44%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

18.58%

+0.53%

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQVAX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

NQVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
NQVAX
Nuveen Multi-Cap Value Fund Class A
1.46%1.66%1.62%1.06%1.17%1.23%3.17%1.10%0.00%1.76%0.79%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQVAX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQVAX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQVAX dropped -67.90% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

NQVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQVAX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer