NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE
NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NQSE.DE tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while LYMS.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NQSE.DE returned 14.91%/yr vs 18.88%/yr for LYMS.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NQSE.DE charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NQSE.DE achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return.
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 52.10% | -36.29% | 27.37% | 45.23% | 35.67% | -15.98% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | -13.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NQSE.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between NQSE.DE and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NQSE.DE
LYMS.DE
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NQSE.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.77 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 11.23 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NQSE.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.40 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.94 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.77 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NQSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQSE.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NQSE.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -50.00% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -10.02% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -26.74% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.67% | -31.12% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.86% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -8.78% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.37% | +0.03% |
Volatility
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that NQSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NQSE.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 4.37% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 10.99% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 15.73% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 19.91% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 19.68% | +1.86% |
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NQSE.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
NQSE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NQSE.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NQSE.DE and LYMS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for NQSE.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for NQSE.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer