NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE
NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NQSE.DE returned 14.91%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NQSE.DE charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NQSE.DE achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 52.10% | -36.29% | 27.37% | 45.23% | 35.67% | -15.98% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NQSE.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, NQSE.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NQSE.DE
EUNA.DE
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NQSE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.06 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 0.43 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 1.18 | +9.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NQSE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.34 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.28 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | -0.05 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NQSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQSE.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NQSE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -17.79% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -2.75% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -4.02% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.67% | -17.03% | -20.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -8.66% | +7.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -6.76% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 0.99% | +2.41% |
Volatility
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that NQSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NQSE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 1.35% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 2.82% | +9.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 3.46% | +12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 4.64% | +16.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 4.27% | +17.27% |
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NQSE.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
NQSE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NQSE.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NQSE.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
NQSE.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.33% for NQSE.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for NQSE.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer