PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQP vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NQP vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NQP vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQP
Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income
2.31%15.46%2.70%7.44%-21.95%7.75%7.08%21.21%-2.28%3.50%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
-0.27%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQP achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than LSMSX's -0.27% return.


NQP

1D
3.20%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
2.31%
6M
3.36%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
1.69%
10Y*
3.35%

LSMSX

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NQP vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQP has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NQP vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQP
NQP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQP vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQPLSMSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

0.67

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

0.89

+1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

0.71

+2.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

1.98

+7.68

NQP vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQP and LSMSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQPLSMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

0.67

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.25

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between NQP and LSMSX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NQP vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

NQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQP
Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income
7.85%7.87%6.69%3.07%4.89%4.51%4.38%4.23%5.34%5.34%5.67%6.10%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.97%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NQP vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQP drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQP and LSMSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NQPLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-15.00%

-26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-6.21%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.41%

-15.00%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-2.62%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-2.88%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.21%

-0.52%

Volatility

NQP vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income (NQP) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 1.10%. This indicates that NQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NQPLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

1.10%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

1.60%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

5.78%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.80%

4.44%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.85%

4.52%

+6.33%