PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPV vs. HHMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPV vs. HHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund (HHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPV achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than HHMIX's 1.46% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: NPV at 2.37% and HHMIX at 2.37%.


NPV

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.88%
6M
5.78%
1Y
10.67%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
-1.49%
10Y*
2.37%

HHMIX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPV vs. HHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.88%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%
HHMIX
Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund
1.46%5.70%2.14%5.92%-8.97%1.73%4.66%7.89%1.35%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NPV and HHMIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.25

The correlation between NPV and HHMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPV vs. HHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

HHMIX
HHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPV vs. HHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) and Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund (HHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NPVHHMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.71

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.24

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.26

7.34

-1.07

NPV vs. HHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the HHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPV and HHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPVHHMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.65

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.36

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.67

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.70

-0.41

Drawdowns

NPV vs. HHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPV drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than HHMIX's maximum drawdown of -30.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPV and HHMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPVHHMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-30.49%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-2.81%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

-4.61%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.25%

-13.76%

-30.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.25%

-13.76%

-30.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.72%

-0.78%

-14.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-3.88%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.86%

+0.85%

Volatility

NPV vs. HHMIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund (HHMIX) at 0.97%. This indicates that NPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPVHHMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

0.97%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

1.93%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

2.38%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

3.33%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

3.57%

+9.62%

NPV vs. HHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPV has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than HHMIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPV vs. HHMIX - Dividend Comparison

NPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than HHMIX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHMIX
Hartford Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.41%4.40%2.72%2.41%2.28%1.72%2.17%2.83%2.86%2.98%2.77%3.04%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.97%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPV and HHMIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to HHMIX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPV dropped -44.25% vs HHMIX's -30.49%.

HHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPV and HHMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer