PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPV vs. FAFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPV vs. FAFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) and Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class (FAFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPV achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than FAFTX's 2.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NPV having a 2.33% annualized return and FAFTX not far behind at 2.32%.


NPV

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
6.88%
6M
5.60%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
-1.49%
10Y*
2.33%

FAFTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.68%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
2.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPV vs. FAFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.88%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%
FAFTX
Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class
2.14%4.88%3.98%6.80%-11.57%2.62%5.74%7.44%0.79%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NPV and FAFTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002

0.21

The correlation between NPV and FAFTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPV vs. FAFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FAFTX
FAFTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FAFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPV vs. FAFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) and Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class (FAFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NPVFAFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.66

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.80

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

10.00

-3.79

NPV vs. FAFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the FAFTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPV and FAFTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPVFAFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.66

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.26

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.54

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

1.02

-0.74

Drawdowns

NPV vs. FAFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPV drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than FAFTX's maximum drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPV and FAFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPVFAFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-17.02%

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-3.10%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

-6.97%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.25%

-17.02%

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.25%

-17.02%

-27.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.72%

-0.07%

-15.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.18%

-2.14%

-8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.87%

+0.84%

Volatility

NPV vs. FAFTX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class (FAFTX) at 1.25%. This indicates that NPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPVFAFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.25%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.04%

2.40%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

3.26%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

4.65%

+8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

4.28%

+8.91%

NPV vs. FAFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPV has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFTX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPV vs. FAFTX - Dividend Comparison

NPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than FAFTX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFTX
Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Advisor Class
3.89%5.05%4.37%3.23%3.34%2.74%2.97%3.92%3.86%3.90%3.63%3.88%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.97%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPV and FAFTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to FAFTX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPV dropped -44.25% vs FAFTX's -17.02%.

FAFTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPV and FAFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer