NPSNY vs. CCH.L
NPSNY (Naspers Ltd ADR) and CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) are both stocks. NPSNY operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CCH.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, NPSNY returned 10.85%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for CCH.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NPSNY is traded in USD, while CCH.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CCH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NPSNY achieves a -21.43% return, which is significantly lower than CCH.L's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, NPSNY has underperformed CCH.L with an annualized return of 10.85%, while CCH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
NPSNY
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- -21.43%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- 1Y
- -12.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.92%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPSNY Naspers Ltd ADR | -21.43% | 52.37% | 30.17% | 2.64% | 6.75% | -23.52% | 25.03% | 20.24% | -29.84% | 93.97% |
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 21.78% | 54.77% | 20.11% | 26.42% | -28.26% | 9.16% | -1.77% | 15.54% | -2.58% | 52.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NPSNY and CCH.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
NPSNY:
$41.61B
CCH.L:
£16.70B
NPSNY:
$2.09
CCH.L:
€4.84
NPSNY:
5.00
CCH.L:
10.98
NPSNY:
0.08
CCH.L:
0.61
NPSNY:
3.20
CCH.L:
0.86
NPSNY:
1.71
CCH.L:
5.03
NPSNY:
$13.01B
CCH.L:
€22.35B
NPSNY:
$5.32B
CCH.L:
€8.14B
NPSNY:
$8.00B
CCH.L:
€3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPSNY vs. CCH.L — Risk / Return Rank
NPSNY
CCH.L
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Naspers Ltd ADR (NPSNY) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NPSNY | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 0.88 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 1.72 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NPSNY drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, which is greater than CCH.L's maximum drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPSNY and CCH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPSNY | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.27% | -52.49% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.58% | -19.11% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.58% | -20.00% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.25% | -50.65% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.27% | -52.49% | -13.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.31% | -3.79% | -26.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -17.86% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.57% | 9.75% | +7.82% |
Volatility
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Volatility Comparison
Naspers Ltd ADR (NPSNY) has a higher volatility of 12.61% compared to Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) at 5.60%. This indicates that NPSNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPSNY | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 5.60% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.19% | 17.28% | +10.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.89% | 23.56% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 26.29% | +20.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.48% | 28.19% | +15.29% |
Dividends
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Dividend Comparison
NPSNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than CCH.L's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
NPSNY Naspers Ltd ADR | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.31% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.17% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.17% | 0.46% | 0.20% |
Financials
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Naspers Ltd ADR and Coca Cola HBC AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NPSNY vs. CCH.L - Profitability Comparison
NPSNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Naspers Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 4.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
NPSNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Naspers Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 184.58M and revenue of 4.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
NPSNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Naspers Ltd ADR reported a net income of 2.39B and revenue of 4.13B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NPSNY and CCH.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NPSNY and CCH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer