PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPSGX vs. VISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPSGX achieves a 29.19% return, which is significantly higher than VISGX's 17.47% return.


NPSGX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.96%
YTD
29.19%
6M
25.75%
1Y
59.53%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*

VISGX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.47%
YTD
17.47%
6M
14.37%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
29.19%17.88%20.83%20.05%-31.62%10.52%69.72%22.14%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
17.47%8.18%14.80%22.91%-28.50%5.58%35.11%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NPSGX and VISGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.94

The correlation between NPSGX and VISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPSGX vs. VISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPSGX
NPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VISGX
VISGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NPSGXVISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

2.58

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

9.63

+6.06

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the VISGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPSGX and VISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPSGX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, smaller than the maximum VISGX drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPSGX and VISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPSGXVISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.95%

-58.74%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-11.39%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-27.58%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.95%

-38.41%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.01%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-11.59%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.04%

+0.65%

Volatility

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) at 7.09%. This indicates that NPSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPSGXVISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.73%

7.09%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

15.77%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.63%

20.35%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.32%

23.71%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.72%

23.03%

+5.69%

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPSGX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VISGX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPSGX vs. VISGX - Dividend Comparison

NPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VISGX's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
3.49%4.50%5.89%0.00%0.00%21.28%9.50%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.34%0.33%0.42%0.56%0.46%0.23%0.35%0.47%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NPSGX and VISGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NPSGX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to VISGX (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPSGX dropped -46.95% vs VISGX's -58.74%.

NPSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPSGX and VISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer