PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPSGX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NPSGX achieves a 32.55% return, which is significantly higher than DSCIX's 27.35% return.


NPSGX

1D
1.94%
1M
6.04%
YTD
32.55%
6M
29.44%
1Y
63.57%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*

DSCIX

1D
0.59%
1M
7.00%
YTD
27.35%
6M
24.76%
1Y
49.12%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
32.55%17.88%20.83%20.05%-31.62%10.52%69.72%22.14%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
27.35%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NPSGX and DSCIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.86

The correlation between NPSGX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPSGX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NPSGX
NPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NPSGXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

7.23

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.74

26.04

-8.31

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NPSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NPSGX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPSGX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, roughly equal to the maximum DSCIX drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPSGX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPSGXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.95%

-47.60%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-7.08%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-32.94%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.95%

-32.94%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-9.82%

-7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

1.96%

+1.73%

Volatility

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 4.51%. This indicates that NPSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPSGXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

4.51%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

12.30%

+8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.57%

17.39%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.31%

22.20%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.72%

23.26%

+5.46%

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPSGX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPSGX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

NPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than DSCIX's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.68%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
3.40%4.50%5.89%0.00%0.00%21.28%9.50%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NPSGX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPSGX has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to DSCIX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NPSGX dropped -46.95% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPSGX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer