PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVP vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVP vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVP achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.98% return.


NOVP

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.96%
YTD
6.63%
6M
6.56%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBAP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
7.98%
6M
8.23%
1Y
15.47%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVP vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NOVP and XBAP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

0.84

The correlation between NOVP and XBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVP vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVP
NOVP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NOVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVP vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVPXBAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.13

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

11.99

-9.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

69.63

-55.43

NOVP vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVP Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVP and XBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVP vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVP drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVP and XBAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVPXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-14.57%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-1.30%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.32%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-1.73%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

0.22%

+0.96%

Volatility

NOVP vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 1.52%. This indicates that NOVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVPXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

1.52%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

2.91%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

3.60%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.64%

9.98%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.64%

9.84%

-0.20%

NOVP vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOVP vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOVP nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVP and XBAP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOVP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to XBAP (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVP dropped -11.79% vs XBAP's -14.57%.

On 1-year performance, NOVP leads with 16.66% vs 15.47% for XBAP. On fees, NOVP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NOVP has performed better with a 16.66% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOVP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

NOVP and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NOVP and 0.79% for XBAP.

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVP and XBAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer