NOVP vs. CPSM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NOVP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November) and CPSM (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NOVP returned 16.09% vs 5.62% for CPSM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NOVP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSM.

Performance

NOVP vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVP achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than CPSM's 2.04% return.

NOVP

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 6.14%
• 1Y: 16.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPSM

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVP vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NOVP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November	5.76%	12.14%	8.67%
CPSM Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May	2.04%	7.21%	4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVP and CPSM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024	0.67

The correlation between NOVP and CPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NOVP vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVP

NOVP Risk / Return Rank: 74
NOVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NOVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NOVP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NOVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NOVP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CPSM

CPSM Risk / Return Rank: 97
CPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVP vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOVP	CPSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	3.57	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	5.89	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.78	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	12.44	-9.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.94	57.40	-43.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOVP vs. CPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the CPSM Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVP and CPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOVP	CPSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	3.57	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	1.51	-0.13

Drawdowns

NOVP vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVP drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, which is greater than CPSM's maximum drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVP and CPSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOVP	CPSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.79%	-5.19%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-0.45%	-5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.28%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-0.20%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	0.10%	+1.06%

Volatility

NOVP vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - November (NOVP) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) at 0.41%. This indicates that NOVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOVP	CPSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	0.41%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.19%	1.15%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	1.58%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	5.09%	+4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	5.09%	+4.57%

NOVP vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOVP vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOVP nor CPSM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOVP and CPSM in my portfolio?

NOVP and CPSM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOVP or CPSM?

NOVP has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to CPSM (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVP dropped -11.79% vs CPSM's -5.19%.

Which ETF is better, NOVP or CPSM?

On 1-year performance, NOVP leads with 16.09% vs 5.62% for CPSM. On fees, NOVP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOVP or CPSM?

Over the 1-year period, NOVP has performed better with a 16.09% return vs 5.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOVP or CPSM?

NOVP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOVP or CPSM?

NOVP and CPSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NOVP and CPSM?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NOVP and 0.69% for CPSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.