PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVM vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVM vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVM achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.98% return.


NOVM

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.54%
6M
2.54%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBAP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
7.98%
6M
8.23%
1Y
15.47%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVM vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NOVM and XBAP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

0.81

The correlation between NOVM and XBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVM vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVM
NOVM Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NOVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVM vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVMXBAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

2.13

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

11.99

-6.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.10

69.63

-38.53

NOVM vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVM Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is comparable to the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVM and XBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVM vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVM drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVM and XBAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVMXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-14.57%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.48%

-1.30%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.32%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-1.73%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.22%

+0.05%

Volatility

NOVM vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November (NOVM) is 0.53%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that NOVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVMXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

1.52%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.68%

2.91%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

3.60%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

9.98%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.97%

9.84%

-6.87%

NOVM vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOVM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOVM vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NOVM nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVM and XBAP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBAP has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to NOVM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVM dropped -3.26% vs XBAP's -14.57%.

On 1-year performance, XBAP leads with 15.47% vs 8.30% for NOVM. On fees, XBAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NOVM has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XBAP has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NOVM.

NOVM and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NOVM and 0.79% for XBAP.

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 3.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVM and XBAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer