PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLVX vs. FSWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLVX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than FSWCX's 16.21% return.


NOLVX

1D
0.75%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.75%
6M
12.74%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
11.35%

FSWCX

1D
0.13%
1M
7.42%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.61%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLVX
Northern Large Cap Value Fund
11.75%18.01%13.56%10.09%-6.16%28.41%1.32%25.95%-8.52%0.19%
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
16.21%22.50%19.90%12.64%-3.50%30.43%-4.44%29.09%-11.54%0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLVX and FSWCX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.94

The correlation between NOLVX and FSWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLVX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLVX
NOLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NOLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWCX
FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOLVXFSWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.67

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

7.06

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

24.81

-5.67

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLVX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOLVXFSWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

3.64

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.86

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.59

-0.21

Drawdowns

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.73%, which is greater than FSWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLVX and FSWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLVXFSWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.73%

-41.41%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-5.77%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-16.13%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.95%

-19.62%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-5.57%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.63%

-0.03%

Volatility

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) have volatilities of 2.69% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLVXFSWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.77%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

7.64%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

11.19%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

16.70%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

20.78%

-2.82%

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLVX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLVX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

NOLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than FSWCX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
6.37%7.40%8.86%9.68%12.90%5.71%2.55%2.37%3.84%0.07%0.00%0.00%
NOLVX
Northern Large Cap Value Fund
4.20%4.70%7.80%5.56%8.37%8.20%1.46%2.01%1.71%2.34%1.52%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLVX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSWCX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to NOLVX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLVX dropped -58.73% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLVX and FSWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer