NODE vs. TOXR
NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and TOXR (21Shares XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck, while TOXR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. NODE is actively managed, while TOXR is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for TOXR.
Performance
NODE vs. TOXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly higher than TOXR's -34.38% return.
NODE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 33.28%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 71.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOXR
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -14.04%
- YTD
- -34.38%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NODE vs. TOXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 33.28% | -10.55% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | -34.38% | -9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NODE and TOXR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NODE vs. TOXR — Risk / Return Rank
NODE
TOXR
NODE vs. TOXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and 21Shares XRP ETF (TOXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NODE | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NODE | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | -0.92 | +2.54 |
Drawdowns
NODE vs. TOXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum TOXR drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and TOXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NODE | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -48.78% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -48.10% | +45.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -31.50% | +20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.00% | — | — |
Volatility
NODE vs. TOXR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NODE | TOXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.44% | 73.16% | -27.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 73.16% | -28.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 73.16% | -28.57% |
NODE vs. TOXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TOXR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NODE vs. TOXR - Dividend Comparison
NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while TOXR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 0.84% | 1.12% |
TOXR 21Shares XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NODE and TOXR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOXR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOXR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.
NODE has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for TOXR.
NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while TOXR is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and 21Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.30% for TOXR.
Find the right allocation for NODE and TOXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer