NODE vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. NODE is actively managed, while REMX is passively managed. Over the past year, NODE returned 71.73% vs 172.35% for REMX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

NODE vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NODE having a 33.28% return and REMX slightly lower at 33.01%.

NODE

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 10.04%
• YTD: 33.28%
• 6M: 21.22%
• 1Y: 71.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

REMX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 33.01%
• 6M: 37.14%
• 1Y: 172.35%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NODE vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	33.28%	32.44%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	33.01%	89.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NODE and REMX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

NODE vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 41
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NODE vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NODE	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	3.61	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.66	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	7.43	-5.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	21.32	-16.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NODE vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NODE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NODE and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NODE	REMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	3.61	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	-0.08	+1.69

Drawdowns

NODE vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NODE	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-90.20%	+54.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.35%	-23.35%	-12.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-54.98%	+52.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-66.87%	+55.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.00%	8.12%	+7.88%

Volatility

NODE vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) have volatilities of 12.39% and 13.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NODE	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	13.02%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.83%	34.77%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.44%	48.11%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.59%	40.24%	+4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.59%	36.94%	+7.65%

NODE vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

NODE vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than REMX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	0.84%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	1.32%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NODE and REMX in my portfolio?

NODE and REMX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NODE or REMX?

REMX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to NODE (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which ETF is better, NODE or REMX?

On 1-year performance, REMX leads with 172.35% vs 71.73% for NODE. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NODE has been the lower-risk option at 12.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NODE or REMX?

Over the 1-year period, REMX has performed better with a 172.35% return vs 71.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NODE or REMX?

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NODE or REMX?

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.84% for NODE.

What is the main difference between NODE and REMX?

NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while REMX is Materials. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.59% for REMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.