NODE vs. OWNB
NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) are both Blockchain funds. NODE is actively managed, while OWNB is passively managed. Over the past year, NODE returned 71.73% vs -28.07% for OWNB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for OWNB.
Performance
NODE vs. OWNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly higher than OWNB's -1.56% return.
NODE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 33.28%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 71.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -18.67%
- 1Y
- -28.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NODE vs. OWNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 33.28% | 32.44% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -1.56% | -23.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NODE and OWNB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NODE and OWNB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NODE vs. OWNB — Risk / Return Rank
NODE
OWNB
NODE vs. OWNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NODE | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.96 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | -0.47 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | -0.83 | +5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NODE | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | -0.49 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | -0.07 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
NODE vs. OWNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum OWNB drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and OWNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NODE | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -59.47% | +24.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.35% | -59.47% | +24.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -44.54% | +42.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -24.89% | +13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.00% | 33.96% | -17.96% |
Volatility
NODE vs. OWNB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is 12.39%, while Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that NODE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NODE | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 13.15% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.83% | 42.52% | -7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.44% | 57.85% | -12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 62.36% | -17.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.59% | 62.36% | -17.77% |
NODE vs. OWNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OWNB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NODE vs. OWNB - Dividend Comparison
NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than OWNB's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF | 0.84% | 1.12% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 0.88% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NODE and OWNB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNB has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to NODE (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs OWNB's -59.47%.
On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 71.73% vs -28.07% for OWNB. On fees, NODE is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, NODE has been the lower-risk option at 12.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 71.73% return vs -28.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NODE is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
OWNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.84% for NODE.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.85% for OWNB.
NODE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NODE and OWNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer