PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NODE vs. IBIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NODE vs. IBIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBIE's 2.10% return.


NODE

1D
-1.79%
1M
10.04%
YTD
33.28%
6M
21.22%
1Y
71.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.07%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NODE vs. IBIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NODE
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
33.28%32.44%
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
2.10%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NODE and IBIE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NODE vs. IBIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NODE
NODE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NODE vs. IBIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NODEIBIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.69

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

8.73

-6.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

25.70

-21.20

NODE vs. IBIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NODE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the IBIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NODE and IBIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NODEIBIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

3.09

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

2.02

-0.40

Drawdowns

NODE vs. IBIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than IBIE's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and IBIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NODEIBIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-1.70%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.35%

-0.55%

-34.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

0.00%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-0.39%

-10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

0.19%

+15.81%

Volatility

NODE vs. IBIE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) at 0.38%. This indicates that NODE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NODEIBIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.39%

0.38%

+12.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.83%

0.97%

+33.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.44%

1.56%

+43.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.59%

2.86%

+41.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.59%

2.86%

+41.73%

NODE vs. IBIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NODE vs. IBIE - Dividend Comparison

NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than IBIE's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
3.25%4.09%4.23%0.75%
NODE
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
0.84%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NODE and IBIE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NODE has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to IBIE (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs IBIE's -1.70%.

On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 71.73% vs 4.80% for IBIE. On fees, IBIE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 71.73% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

IBIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.84% for NODE.

NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while IBIE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.10% for IBIE.

IBIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NODE and IBIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer