NODE vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NODE returned 65.00% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

NODE vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 32.11% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.

NODE

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 32.11%
• 6M: 27.03%
• 1Y: 65.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NODE vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	32.11%	32.27%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NODE and CSHP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

NODE vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 39
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 39
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NODE vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NODE	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	11.09	-9.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	27.60	-25.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	6.46	-5.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	65.45	-63.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	381.67	-377.62

NODE vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NODE Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NODE and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NODE vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NODE	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-0.08%	-35.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.35%	-0.06%	-35.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-0.04%	-3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.01%	-0.00%	-11.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.08%	0.01%	+16.07%

Volatility

NODE vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that NODE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NODE	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.45%	0.16%	+14.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.66%	0.27%	+35.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.89%	0.36%	+46.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.29%	0.41%	+44.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.29%	0.41%	+44.88%

NODE vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

NODE vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	0.85%	1.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NODE and CSHP in my portfolio?

NODE and CSHP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NODE or CSHP?

NODE has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, NODE or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, NODE leads with 65.00% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NODE or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, NODE has performed better with a 65.00% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NODE or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NODE or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.85% for NODE.

What is the main difference between NODE and CSHP?

NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.