PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOCT vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOCT vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


NOCT

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.61%
6M
7.69%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOCT vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
7.61%12.81%12.10%30.67%-13.42%12.10%11.64%5.54%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%16.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NOCT and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.09

The correlation between NOCT and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOCT vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NOCT
DBO

Technology

54.2%

-

Communication Services

15.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
116.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

NOCT
54.2%
DBO

-

Communication Services

NOCT
15.5%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

NOCT
12.2%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

NOCT
7.6%
DBO

-

Healthcare

NOCT
4.2%
DBO

-

Industrials

NOCT
2.8%
DBO

-

Utilities

NOCT
1.4%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

NOCT
1.2%
DBO

-

Energy

NOCT
0.6%
DBO

-

Financial Services

NOCT
0.2%
DBO
116.0%

Real Estate

NOCT
0.1%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOCT vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCT
NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCT vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOCTDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.44

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

9.02

+4.87

NOCT vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCT and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOCTDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.34

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.50

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.02

+0.98

Drawdowns

NOCT vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCTDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-90.18%

+73.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-18.19%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-28.20%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-37.68%

+21.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-51.38%

+51.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-62.25%

+59.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

8.92%

-7.67%

Volatility

NOCT vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOCTDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

12.61%

-11.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

28.20%

-22.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

34.46%

-26.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

32.29%

-21.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

31.78%

-20.59%

NOCT vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOCT vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOCT and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 10.46% for NOCT. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.

NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOCT and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer