PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBOX vs. NHFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) and Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBOX achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than NHFIX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBOX has underperformed NHFIX with an annualized return of 1.11%, while NHFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.53% annualized return.


NOBOX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.15%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
1.11%

NHFIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
5.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
-0.17%6.14%0.82%4.86%-13.84%-2.10%7.20%8.73%-0.17%3.60%
NHFIX
Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund
1.70%8.79%8.03%13.96%-13.74%5.03%6.04%16.17%-3.60%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBOX and NHFIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.15

Over the past year, NOBOX and NHFIX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBOX vs. NHFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBOX
NOBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NOBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

NHFIX
NHFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NHFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NHFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) and Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOBOXNHFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.54

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.68

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

15.16

-10.70

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the NHFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBOX and NHFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOBOXNHFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.28

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.71

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.93

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.06

-0.47

Drawdowns

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBOX drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, smaller than the maximum NHFIX drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBOX and NHFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBOXNHFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-27.87%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-2.10%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-4.39%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-17.47%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.03%

-24.72%

+4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-0.16%

-5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-2.78%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.50%

+0.59%

Volatility

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund (NHFIX) at 1.21%. This indicates that NOBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBOXNHFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.21%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.58%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

3.38%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

5.10%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

5.95%

-0.92%

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBOX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NHFIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBOX vs. NHFIX - Dividend Comparison

NOBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NHFIX's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHFIX
Northern High Yield Fixed Income Fund
7.01%6.87%6.67%6.57%3.84%4.92%5.41%6.35%6.85%6.66%5.57%6.19%
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
3.75%2.88%3.46%2.63%1.53%2.10%3.12%3.18%2.80%2.77%2.45%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBOX and NHFIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBOX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to NHFIX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBOX dropped -20.03% vs NHFIX's -27.87%.

NHFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBOX and NHFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer