PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNY vs. NAZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NNY vs. NAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund (NNY) and Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNY achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than NAZ's 5.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NNY having a 1.37% annualized return and NAZ not far behind at 1.35%.


NNY

1D
-0.48%
1M
-5.51%
6M
-2.19%
YTD
-1.45%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
3.29%

NAZ

1D
-0.08%
1M
-3.34%
6M
3.62%
YTD
5.59%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*
1.35%
ALL TIME*
4.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$426.19K$342.59K$280.69K
$404.02K$287.10K$251.44K

NNY vs. NAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NNY
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund
-1.45%11.17%1.19%4.30%-13.41%1.85%-1.65%13.73%4.51%4.12%
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.59%12.08%12.93%-0.48%-27.24%4.75%22.64%18.15%-12.52%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NNY and NAZ is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.14

The correlation between NNY and NAZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNY vs. NAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NNY
NNY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NAZ
NAZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NNY vs. NAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund (NNY) and Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NNYNAZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.42

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

4.72

-1.17

NNY vs. NAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the NAZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNY and NAZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NNY vs. NAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNY drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, roughly equal to the maximum NAZ drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNY and NAZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NNYNAZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.62%

-38.28%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.97%

-8.34%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.40%

-13.76%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.62%

-38.28%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.02%

-38.28%

+18.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-8.34%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-9.32%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.51%

-0.54%

Volatility

NNY vs. NAZ - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund (NNY) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ) at 2.58%. This indicates that NNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NNYNAZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.58%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

10.17%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

11.99%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

13.72%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.29%

14.94%

-2.65%

NNY vs. NAZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NNY and NAZ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NNY vs. NAZ - Dividend Comparison

NNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than NAZ's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.50%7.09%6.20%3.63%5.01%3.75%3.52%3.82%4.52%4.65%5.53%5.25%
NNY
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund
4.30%4.13%4.25%3.99%3.50%2.96%3.29%3.42%3.77%4.00%4.10%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NNY and NAZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NNY has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to NAZ (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNY dropped -36.62% vs NAZ's -38.28%.

NAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NNY and NAZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer