PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNNN vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NNNN vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NNNN vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NNNN
Anbio Biotechnology Class A
-14.57%421.14%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-13.58%-47.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNNN achieves a -14.57% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -13.58% return.


NNNN

1D
4.39%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-14.57%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
244.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
2.45%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-13.58%
6M
-54.23%
1Y
-48.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNNN vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNNN
NNNN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NNNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNNN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NNNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNNN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNNN vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NNNNMSTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

-0.77

+2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

-1.05

+3.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.88

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

-0.68

+3.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

-1.22

+7.89

NNNN vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNNN Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNNN and MSTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NNNNMSTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

-0.77

+2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.95

0.29

+1.66

Correlation

The correlation between NNNN and MSTY is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NNNN vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

NNNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 298.73%.


TTM20252024
NNNN
Anbio Biotechnology Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
298.73%294.61%104.56%

Drawdowns

NNNN vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNNN drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNNN and MSTY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NNNNMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.41%

-71.79%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.41%

-71.79%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.69%

-66.02%

+15.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-23.37%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.02%

40.02%

-4.00%

Volatility

NNNN vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) has a higher volatility of 23.07% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 14.90%. This indicates that NNNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NNNNMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.07%

14.90%

+8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

123.34%

48.86%

+74.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

152.38%

63.88%

+88.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.52%

72.67%

+73.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.52%

72.67%

+73.85%