NNNN vs. MSTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NNNN (Anbio Biotechnology Class A) is a stock, while MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, NNNN returned 247.75% vs -61.25% for MSTY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NNNN vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNNN achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -14.73% return.

NNNN

• 1D: -11.24%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: -5.19%
• 6M: -17.41%
• 1Y: 247.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTY

• 1D: -6.76%
• 1M: -28.46%
• YTD: -14.73%
• 6M: -26.86%
• 1Y: -61.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NNNN vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NNNN Anbio Biotechnology Class A	-5.19%	421.14%
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-14.73%	-47.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NNNN and MSTY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

NNNN vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNNN

NNNN Risk / Return Rank: 83
NNNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NNNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
NNNN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
NNNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NNNN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

MSTY

MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNNN vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NNNN	MSTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	-1.02	+2.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	-1.73	+4.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.81	+0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	-0.86	+4.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	-1.31	+7.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NNNN vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNNN Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNNN and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NNNN	MSTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	-1.02	+2.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	0.26	+1.53

Drawdowns

NNNN vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNNN drawdown since its inception was -76.41%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNNN and MSTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNNN	MSTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.41%	-71.79%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.41%	-71.79%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.28%	-66.48%	+21.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-26.09%	-2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.55%	46.87%	-6.32%

Volatility

NNNN vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

Anbio Biotechnology Class A (NNNN) has a higher volatility of 29.66% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 17.01%. This indicates that NNNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNNN	MSTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.66%	17.01%	+12.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	87.31%	48.79%	+38.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	154.23%	60.44%	+93.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.99%	71.92%	+67.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.99%	71.92%	+67.07%

Dividends

NNNN vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

NNNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 269.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	269.45%	294.61%	104.56%
NNNN Anbio Biotechnology Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NNNN and MSTY in my portfolio?

NNNN and MSTY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NNNN or MSTY?

NNNN has higher volatility (29.66%) compared to MSTY (17.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNNN dropped -76.41% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NNNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.