NMULX vs. VITPX
NMULX (Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund) and VITPX (Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NMULX returned 13.00%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for VITPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NMULX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for VITPX.
Performance
NMULX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMULX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NMULX has underperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 13.00%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.10% annualized return.
NMULX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
VITPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
NMULX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund | 5.89% | 14.81% | 20.55% | 18.35% | -17.68% | 26.48% | 12.47% | 28.20% | -4.78% | 24.90% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | 11.70% | 17.17% | 25.43% | 26.01% | -19.48% | 25.76% | 20.95% | 30.87% | -5.59% | 20.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMULX and VITPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2006 | 0.96 |
The correlation between NMULX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMULX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank
NMULX
VITPX
NMULX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMULX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.24 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 14.96 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMULX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.37 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.76 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.82 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
NMULX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMULX drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, roughly equal to the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMULX and VITPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMULX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -55.28% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -8.92% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.50% | -19.35% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.05% | -25.31% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -34.99% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.25% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -8.02% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility
NMULX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMULX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.99% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 9.21% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.33% | 12.21% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 17.35% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 18.41% | +2.45% |
NMULX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMULX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMULX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison
NMULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than VITPX's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.65% | 0.69% | 2.93% | 22.77% | 30.16% | 34.21% | 24.27% | 20.47% | 11.21% | 10.49% | 3.61% | 3.71% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | 2.24% | 2.64% | 4.14% | 2.41% | 6.48% | 5.38% | 11.57% | 2.91% | 3.93% | 1.90% | 2.80% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NMULX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NMULX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to VITPX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMULX dropped -56.00% vs VITPX's -55.28%.
VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMULX and VITPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer