PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMULX vs. QUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMULX vs. QUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMULX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than QUERX's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NMULX has outperformed QUERX with an annualized return of 13.41%, while QUERX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.


NMULX

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
4.01%
6M
2.78%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
13.41%

QUERX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.72%
6M
3.43%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMULX vs. QUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMULX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund
4.01%14.81%20.55%18.35%-17.68%26.48%12.47%28.20%-4.78%24.90%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
4.72%6.98%13.98%9.55%-13.73%23.56%13.20%28.82%-0.21%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NMULX and QUERX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between NMULX and QUERX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMULX vs. QUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMULX
NMULX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NMULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMULX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NMULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMULX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QUERX
QUERX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
QUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
QUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMULX vs. QUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMULXQUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.06

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

3.52

+4.00

NMULX vs. QUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the QUERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMULX and QUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMULX vs. QUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMULX drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than QUERX's maximum drawdown of -30.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMULX and QUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMULXQUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.00%

-30.81%

-25.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-5.93%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-10.21%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.05%

-22.04%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.41%

-30.81%

-8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-2.28%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-3.91%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.78%

+0.29%

Volatility

NMULX vs. QUERX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMULXQUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.47%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

6.27%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

8.39%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

13.04%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

15.22%

+5.60%

NMULX vs. QUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMULX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than QUERX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMULX vs. QUERX - Dividend Comparison

NMULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than QUERX's 21.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMULX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund
0.66%0.69%2.93%22.77%30.16%34.21%24.27%20.47%11.21%10.49%3.61%3.71%
QUERX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6
21.83%22.86%24.47%24.43%10.37%2.62%1.37%1.18%1.74%2.45%2.06%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMULX and QUERX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMULX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to QUERX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMULX dropped -56.00% vs QUERX's -30.81%.

NMULX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMULX and QUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer