NMULX vs. PAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX).
NMULX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Nov 2, 2006. PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund | -4.01% | 14.81% | 20.55% | 18.35% | -17.68% | 26.48% | 12.47% | 28.20% | -4.78% | 24.90% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | -0.28% | 36.92% | 44.52% | 38.73% | -26.06% | 24.84% | 37.65% | 40.34% | -12.41% | 21.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMULX achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NMULX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 12.17%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.12% annualized return.
NMULX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
PAGRX
- 1D
- 3.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 43.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMULX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMULX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
NMULX
PAGRX
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMULX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 1.74 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.49 | -1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 3.21 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 16.28 | -11.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMULX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.74 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMULX and PAGRX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison
NMULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMULX Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.72% | 0.69% | 2.93% | 22.77% | 30.16% | 34.21% | 24.27% | 20.47% | 11.21% | 10.49% | 3.61% | 3.71% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | 0.03% | 0.03% | 5.62% | 2.72% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 15.08% | 17.51% | 12.33% | 8.70% | 16.94% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMULX drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMULX and PAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMULX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.00% | -55.87% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -13.80% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.05% | -36.52% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -38.01% | -1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -5.77% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -10.09% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.73% | -0.16% |
Volatility
NMULX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) is 4.76%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that NMULX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMULX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 6.77% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 13.91% | -5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 25.69% | -8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 24.53% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 24.49% | -3.63% |