PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMT vs. NRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMT vs. NRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMT achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly higher than NRK's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NMT has outperformed NRK with an annualized return of 2.33%, while NRK has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


NMT

1D
-0.95%
1M
-2.63%
6M
10.49%
YTD
14.69%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
2.33%
ALL TIME*
5.84%

NRK

1D
-0.48%
1M
-3.52%
6M
5.08%
YTD
6.63%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
1.79%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$248.00K$301.58K$262.08K
$2.61M$2.37M$2.70M

NMT vs. NRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
14.69%5.77%16.29%2.58%-30.45%12.42%6.47%25.65%-14.05%13.80%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
6.63%4.74%5.93%7.03%-21.84%6.24%4.08%21.43%-5.98%6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NMT and NRK is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2003

0.24

The correlation between NMT and NRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMT vs. NRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMT
NMT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NRK
NRK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRK Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMT vs. NRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMTNRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.39

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

12.14

-2.81

NMT vs. NRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the NRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMT and NRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMT vs. NRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMT drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, roughly equal to the maximum NRK drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMT and NRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTNRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.12%

-40.18%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-5.32%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-11.49%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-31.06%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-31.06%

-7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-3.97%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-8.14%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.48%

+0.41%

Volatility

NMT vs. NRK - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) at 2.24%. This indicates that NMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTNRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.24%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

6.97%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

8.51%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.34%

9.99%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

10.34%

+3.72%

NMT vs. NRK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NRK's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMT vs. NRK - Dividend Comparison

NMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than NRK's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.12%7.27%5.94%3.06%4.50%3.43%3.60%3.46%4.66%4.57%5.30%5.15%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
7.99%8.21%6.74%4.06%5.41%4.18%4.15%3.98%4.68%4.85%5.37%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMT and NRK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMT has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to NRK (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMT dropped -40.12% vs NRK's -40.18%.

NRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMT and NRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer