PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMT vs. BATVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NMT vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NMT vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
10.44%5.77%16.29%2.58%-30.45%8.37%
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
0.33%2.80%2.48%1.41%-0.10%0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMT achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than BATVX's 0.33% return.


NMT

1D
0.00%
1M
4.35%
YTD
10.44%
6M
9.58%
1Y
10.65%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
2.89%

BATVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.33%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NMT vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NMT vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMT
NMT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BATVX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMT vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMTBATVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

3.40

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.96

NMT vs. BATVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the BATVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMT and BATVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMTBATVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

3.40

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

2.29

-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between NMT and BATVX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NMT vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison

NMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than BATVX's 2.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMT
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.52%7.27%5.94%3.06%4.50%3.43%3.60%3.46%4.66%4.57%5.30%5.15%
BATVX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares
2.42%2.76%2.44%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NMT vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMT drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMT and BATVX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTBATVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.12%

-0.20%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

0.00%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.73%

0.00%

-3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-0.03%

-8.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

0.00%

+2.88%

Volatility

NMT vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMT) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NMTBATVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

0.00%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

0.51%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

0.76%

+10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

0.62%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

0.62%

+13.40%