PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMSCX vs. VSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMSCX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than VSCPX's 14.95% return. Over the past 10 years, NMSCX has underperformed VSCPX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while VSCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return.


NMSCX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.61%
YTD
16.29%
6M
15.32%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
10.49%

VSCPX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.24%
YTD
14.95%
6M
14.90%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMSCX
Columbia Small Cap Index Fund
16.29%5.98%8.53%15.78%-16.25%26.36%11.20%22.70%-8.76%11.77%
VSCPX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
14.95%8.86%12.98%19.52%-17.59%17.75%19.09%27.40%-9.31%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NMSCX and VSCPX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

0.97

The correlation between NMSCX and VSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMSCX vs. VSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMSCX
NMSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NMSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NMSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCPX
VSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMSCXVSCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

3.52

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

12.99

+0.42

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMSCX and VSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMSCXVSCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.94

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.54

-0.09

Drawdowns

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.97%, which is greater than VSCPX's maximum drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMSCX and VSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMSCXVSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.97%

-41.81%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.97%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-25.25%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.92%

-28.13%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.31%

-41.81%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-6.49%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.42%

+0.18%

Volatility

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSCPX) have volatilities of 4.46% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMSCXVSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

4.40%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

11.72%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

16.27%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

20.72%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

21.57%

+1.63%

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMSCX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NMSCX vs. VSCPX - Dividend Comparison

NMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than VSCPX's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMSCX
Columbia Small Cap Index Fund
10.41%12.11%15.80%5.44%10.78%8.22%3.07%6.37%11.64%6.43%7.28%11.25%
VSCPX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.20%1.35%1.32%1.56%1.56%1.26%1.16%1.41%1.69%1.37%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NMSCX and VSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NMSCX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to VSCPX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMSCX dropped -54.97% vs VSCPX's -41.81%.

NMSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMSCX and VSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer