NMSCX vs. FSSNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX).
NMSCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Oct 15, 1996. FSSNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMSCX Columbia Small Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 5.98% | 8.53% | 15.78% | -16.25% | 26.36% | 11.20% | 22.70% | -8.76% | 11.77% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | -2.46% | 12.94% | 11.71% | 17.11% | -20.28% | 14.70% | 19.99% | 25.70% | -11.24% | 14.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMSCX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than FSSNX's -2.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMSCX having a 9.25% annualized return and FSSNX not far ahead at 9.53%.
NMSCX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -6.74%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
FSSNX
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMSCX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NMSCX vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank
NMSCX
FSSNX
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMSCX | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.92 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.34 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | 5.05 | -0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMSCX | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.92 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMSCX and FSSNX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison
NMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than FSSNX's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMSCX Columbia Small Cap Index Fund | 12.04% | 12.11% | 15.80% | 5.44% | 10.78% | 8.22% | 3.07% | 6.37% | 11.64% | 6.43% | 7.28% | 11.25% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.04% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 3.92% | 0.94% | 2.96% | 4.94% | 3.37% | 2.27% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.97%, which is greater than FSSNX's maximum drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMSCX and FSSNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMSCX | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.97% | -41.72% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -13.89% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.92% | -31.87% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.31% | -41.72% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.35% | -11.00% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -8.37% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 3.68% | -0.03% |
Volatility
NMSCX vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) is 5.55%, while Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that NMSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMSCX | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 6.60% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 14.12% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 23.11% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 22.56% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 23.38% | -0.20% |