PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMSCX vs. DFISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMSCX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NMSCX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.36% annualized return.


NMSCX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.61%
YTD
16.29%
6M
15.32%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
10.49%

DFISX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMSCX
Columbia Small Cap Index Fund
16.29%5.98%8.53%15.78%-16.25%26.36%11.20%22.70%-8.76%11.77%
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.65%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.42%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NMSCX and DFISX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 1996

0.55

The correlation between NMSCX and DFISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMSCX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMSCX
NMSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NMSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NMSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMSCXDFISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

2.15

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

7.90

+5.51

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the DFISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMSCX and DFISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMSCXDFISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.87

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.46

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.52

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Drawdowns

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.97%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMSCX and DFISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMSCXDFISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.97%

-60.66%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-11.96%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-13.68%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.92%

-35.06%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.31%

-43.00%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.31%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-11.64%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.24%

-0.64%

Volatility

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Small Cap Index Fund (NMSCX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 3.78%. This indicates that NMSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMSCXDFISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.78%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

11.00%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

13.77%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

15.89%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

16.20%

+7.00%

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMSCX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMSCX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison

NMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than DFISX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
NMSCX
Columbia Small Cap Index Fund
10.41%12.11%15.80%5.44%10.78%8.22%3.07%6.37%11.64%6.43%7.28%11.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMSCX and DFISX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMSCX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to DFISX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMSCX dropped -54.97% vs DFISX's -60.66%.

NMSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMSCX and DFISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer