PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMMDX vs. NPSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Maryland Municipal Bond Fund (NMMDX) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMMDX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than NPSRX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NMMDX has underperformed NPSRX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while NPSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.21% annualized return.


NMMDX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.08%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
2.19%

NPSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.40%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
10.01%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMMDX
Nuveen Maryland Municipal Bond Fund
1.76%3.60%2.31%7.08%-10.70%2.57%4.60%7.31%0.86%5.66%
NPSRX
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund
0.72%11.19%9.12%6.19%-9.50%5.43%5.53%17.68%-5.65%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NMMDX and NPSRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2006

0.26

Over the past year, NMMDX and NPSRX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMMDX vs. NPSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMMDX
NMMDX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NMMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NPSRX
NPSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Maryland Municipal Bond Fund (NMMDX) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMMDXNPSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.72

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.70

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

10.81

-1.45

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMMDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the NPSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMMDX and NPSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMMDXNPSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.73

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.49

+0.68

Drawdowns

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMMDX drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum NPSRX drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMMDX and NPSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMMDXNPSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-62.52%

+46.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-3.30%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.11%

-3.60%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.95%

-17.65%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.95%

-26.47%

+10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.67%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-4.82%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.82%

+0.04%

Volatility

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Maryland Municipal Bond Fund (NMMDX) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMMDXNPSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.41%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

3.02%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.99%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

6.33%

-2.07%

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMMDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than NPSRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMMDX vs. NPSRX - Dividend Comparison

NMMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than NPSRX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMMDX
Nuveen Maryland Municipal Bond Fund
3.40%3.68%3.50%3.26%2.88%2.44%2.62%3.37%3.31%3.22%3.74%3.72%
NPSRX
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund
5.39%5.72%5.38%5.87%6.18%4.97%5.02%5.39%6.00%5.51%5.81%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMMDX and NPSRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMMDX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to NPSRX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMMDX dropped -15.95% vs NPSRX's -62.52%.

NPSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMMDX and NPSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer