PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIEX vs. FIGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIEX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than FIGSX's 7.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMIEX having a 10.39% annualized return and FIGSX not far behind at 10.19%.


NMIEX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.23%
YTD
10.60%
6M
13.43%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
10.39%

FIGSX

1D
1.23%
1M
3.27%
YTD
7.48%
6M
8.70%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIEX
Northern Active M International Equity Fund
10.60%34.98%4.43%20.82%-17.17%14.41%11.70%22.93%-13.76%29.06%
FIGSX
Fidelity Series International Growth Fund
7.48%19.12%5.93%21.74%-22.87%16.61%18.52%35.59%-10.97%30.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIEX and FIGSX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2009

0.93

The correlation between NMIEX and FIGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIEX vs. FIGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIEX
NMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGSX
FIGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FIGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIEXFIGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.10

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

4.07

+3.55

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FIGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIEX and FIGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIEXFIGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.84

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.36

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.51

-0.21

Drawdowns

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.92%, which is greater than FIGSX's maximum drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIEX and FIGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIEXFIGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.92%

-34.47%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-13.89%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-16.29%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.54%

-34.47%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-34.47%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.14%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-6.46%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.75%

-0.60%

Volatility

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) is 4.59%, while Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that NMIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIEXFIGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

7.37%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

15.91%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

18.26%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

18.04%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.81%

-0.86%

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIEX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIEX vs. FIGSX - Dividend Comparison

NMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than FIGSX's 8.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIGSX
Fidelity Series International Growth Fund
8.07%8.67%4.29%1.27%3.53%8.33%16.24%3.64%7.47%3.14%2.54%3.54%
NMIEX
Northern Active M International Equity Fund
9.44%10.43%14.92%6.95%1.53%10.42%0.80%5.83%6.65%1.34%1.73%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMIEX and FIGSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIGSX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to NMIEX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIEX dropped -55.92% vs FIGSX's -34.47%.

NMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIEX and FIGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer